(Washington, DC) – Today, United States Senator Dean Heller spoke on the Senate Floor about his support of this year’s National Defense Authorization Act, specifically his support of some public lands provisions. The lands provisions include several Nevada public lands priorities that will grow the Nevada’s economy with mine expansion and development of public land.
REMARKS AS PREPARED:
I rise today to speak in support of some of the public lands provisions that were included in this year’s National Defense Authorization Act.
Before I do so, I would first like to recognize the work Senators Levin and Inhofe have put into this bill and their dedication to reaching an agreement with the House so that this bill can move forward on time as it has for over 50 years.
As a member of the Veterans’ Affairs Committee, I hear every day about the sacrifices service members make to protect our country.
Passing the authorization bill that helps ensure they have the equipment they need and the resources required to meet the mission they are tasked with is important.
While I am pleased the Senate will be moving forward on this bill, I would like to note that the bill’s reduction in service members’ benefits concerns me. I believe Members should have had the chance to debate and amend this, and I hope the Senate will have that opportunity in the future.
This year, the final defense bill includes several Nevada public lands priorities that will spur economic development and job creation in our state while enhancing U.S. national security. I have been working on many of these proposals since I was first elected to Congress in 2006.
I want to thank incoming Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chair Lisa Murkowksi for her leadership and work on this public lands package.
We have been working together for years on many of the bills included in the package, and I’m glad to see them get across the finish line.
Let me first clarify that just because some of these bills are related to public lands does not mean that they do not have a direct relationship to defense and protecting our national security. My Nevada Copper bill will increase domestic production of copper, the second most used mineral at the Department of the Defense as well as directly benefitting two bases located in the State of Nevada.
Mr. President, as you may know, roughly 85 percent of the land in Nevada is controlled by the federal government. This presents our local and state governments with many unique challenges. Our communities’ economies are directly tied to the way the federal government manages those lands.
They often work closely with me to develop legislative solutions to their problems. Whereas out east, local government can acquire land on their own to build public works projects; out west we unfortunately have to get Congress’ permission.
That is why reducing the federal estate and increasing access to our public lands has been one of my top priorities in Congress, and this package goes a long way towards accomplishing these goals.
It resolves over sixty of these types of issues throughout the west. In total, over 110,000 acres of land will be removed from federal ownership and utilized for mineral production, timber production, infrastructure projects and other community development. In addition, it releases approximately 26,000 acres of current wilderness study areas, which unlocks lands to be used for multiple-use.
It is important to discuss the eight Nevada provisions today, to show my colleagues here the many hoops our western communities have to go through to take the same steps that many eastern communities can accomplish in a day’s time.
The Lyon County Economic Development and Conservation Act is a jobs bill that I first introduced while in the House but has been held up by Senate gridlock for years.
This bill allows the City of Yerington to partner with Nevada Copper to develop roughly 12,500 acres of land surrounding the Nevada Copper Pumpkin Hollow project site to be used for mining activities, industrial and renewable energy development, and recreation.
Senate passage is the final hurdle to more than 1,000 new jobs at an average wage of over $85,000 per year. The mine will contribute nearly $25 million in property and net proceeds taxes per year that would be distributed to the State, Lyon County, their Schools, the hospital district, and the Mason Valley Fire Protection District.
In addition, Nevada Copper plans to invest $80 million in infrastructure for the mine and processing facilities that can be utilized to support other land uses and economic development. This bill will transform the local economy of the one of the counties in our nation that is struggling most due to the recent economic downturn.
As I said before, Copper is the second most used mineral at the Department of the Defense, and is considered an essential mineral for weapons production.
Copper is also the primary mineral from which other strategic and critical metals like Rhenium are derived. A domestic supply of this important resource greatly benefits our national security.
Second – there is a provision in this package that will allow Naval Air Station Fallon to acquire over 400 acres of BLM land for a safety arc for an explosive ordinance handling facility and to construct the much needed family housing at the station. Both of these plans will greatly benefit mission operations and the quality of life for our brave service members serving there. The station first asked for these lands over twenty years ago. I am glad their wait will finally end.
Third – the package includes the Pine Forest Range Recreation Enhancement Act, a proposal that has been in the works in Humboldt County for nearly a decade. Just north of the Black Rock Desert, the Pine Forest offers a diverse landscape of sagebrush, aspen and rock formations. Scenic lakes and reservoirs offer world-class trout fisheries.
From the ranchers who make their livelihood on grazing allotments to conservationists’ intent on preserving a rugged landscape, anyone familiar with the place agrees it’s special.
In addition to conserving these areas the bill releases areas from wilderness that needs watershed restoration and treatment due to a high wildfire threat. It also provides for the construction of additional campsites and accommodations for motorized camping.
The initial work on the Pine Forest bill was grassroots driven, transparent, and ultimately supported unanimously by all stakeholders and local governments in this county.
Fourth – the package includes the Elko Motocross and Tribal Conveyance Act, another bill I first introduced in the 111th Congress as a member of the House. This common-sense bill conveys 275 acres of BLM lands to Elko County for a public motocross park. Additionally, it provides 373 acres to the Elko Band of the Te-Moak Tribe for housing and tribal economic development.
Outdoor recreation and tourism are such important parts of life in Nevada. Opening up this land will benefit the residents of Northern Nevada for years to come.
Fifth - this lands package includes the Las Vegas Valley Public Land and Tule Spring Fossil Beds National Monument Act, which is the culmination of several years of effort to conserve the ancient Tule Springs Fossil Beds while providing job creation opportunities and critical civilian and military infrastructure that will be necessary to meet the needs of the Las Vegas Valley.
After working with stakeholders at every level, I am pleased that we can navigate a path forward for southern Nevada.
While serving in the House, I also introduced legislation in both the 110th and 111th Congresses to convey parcels of BLM land to the Nellis Air Force Base, to create an off-highway vehicle park in the Nellis Dunes, and to convey land to the Nevada System of Higher Education to expand educational opportunities for Southern Nevadans.
Those smaller bills were ultimately included in S.973 this Congress, so I am pleased that over six years of work on this Tule Springs legislation will finally become a reality.
The final three Nevada bills included in the lands package are newer proposals, but achieve long-term economic development objectives that the affected communities have long-pursued.
The Fernley Economic Self-Determination Act provides Fernley the opportunity to purchase up to 9,114 acres of federal land within the city boundaries for the purpose of economic development.
Fernley was incorporated in 2001. Since incorporation, the City has been working with private business partners and state and federal regional agencies to develop a long-term economic development plan. These parcels have significant potential for commercial and industrial development, agriculture activities, and the expansion of community events.
Similarly, the Carlin Economic Self-Determination Act allows Carlin to purchase up to 1,329 acres of BLM lands. This city, located in Elko County, is completely landlocked by federal land. Without this legislation, it would be impossible for their leaders to meet the demand for expansion their growing population needs.
Finally, the Storey County provision conveys over 1,700 acres of BLM lands to Virginia City. These properties have been occupied for decades by individuals who purchased them or acquired them legally, yet their continued residency is trespass according to the federal government.
It is a very burdensome oversight by the federal government that must be resolved for the sake of my constituents. They have struggled for years haunted by this error that is the result of no fault of their own.
As you can see, these small public lands proposals are going to make a MAJOR impact on Nevada’s economy. They have all been developed at the local level and signed off on by the local communities
I understand my colleagues concerns that would have liked the opportunity to debate and vote on more amendments to this bill. I too, had filed a number of amendments that I would have liked to see considered and will continue pushing those priorities next year.
Right now, Congress has the rare opportunity to pass this public lands package that enables important mining, energy development, ranching, and timber work to go forward generating economic and employment opportunities for my and other states and local residents. Let’s get the government off these Nevadans’ backs and allow them to do what they do best – creating jobs.
(Washington, DC) – Today, United States Senator Dean Heller spoke at the Commerce Committee hearing addressing the nomination of Mark Rosekind to be administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, along with two other nominations. More specifically, Heller emphasized the importance of Americans knowing they are safe in their vehicles and of employees of NHTSA having proper knowledge of technological features in these cars to ensure safety for consumers.
(Washington, DC) – Today, United States Senator Dean Heller spoke at the Commerce Committee hearing, “Addressing Domestic Violence in Professional Sports,” about the necessity to hold professional sports leagues and players accountable for their actions in domestic violence disputes.
REMARKS AS PREPARED:
Thank you Mr. Chairman, and I appreciate the committee’s attention to this important issue.
I know there are some that may question why Congress is involved in this issue. Let me explain why. Every minute in the United States, 20 people will experience domestic violence.
Last night, more than 20,000 phone calls were made to domestic violence hotlines. One in three women will experience physical violence from a partner in their lifetime. And children exposed to domestic violence are more likely commit domestic violence later in life. As a husband, and as a father of two wonderful daughters, this is simply unacceptable and something that must be changed.
These numbers aren’t just statistics – they’re people. They are wives, mothers, daughters, sisters, and friends. The witnesses before us today represent the most popular and commercially successful sports leagues in the world. Their star players are household names and role models for fans and aspiring young athletes.
In the past few years, we’ve witnessed some truly shocking acts from some of these public figures. But just as concerning is how the leagues handled these situations and how the unions protected these players.
It’s very clear to me that getting these players back on the field was more important than addressing incidents of sexual assault, domestic violence, even child abuse. The leagues and the unions simply brushed these problems aside and left it to the courts.
Only when a video surfaced of the brutal punch an NFL player landed on his wife did the collective conscience of America demand these leagues and unions change their approach.
I can only imagine what survivors feel like today. As I wrote in a letter earlier this year to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, by waiting until the video of a shocking act of domestic violence by one of their players became public, they effectively condoned the action of this player.
I believe the same holds true for the players association and in fact don’t think you even understand the full scope of the problem.
When the Ray Rice decision was overturned the NFL Players Association said:
“This decision is a victory for a disciplinary process that is fair and transparent, this union will always stand up and fight for the due process rights of our players.”
This is not about due process. This is not about the collective bargaining agreement you do not like anymore and want to change. This is not about any type of labor issues you may have with the league.
This is about helping to stop a terrible problem in society. Wives, mothers, sisters, daughters and friends are being beaten. When you are worrying more about getting back on the field instead of stopping abuse, your priorities are out of order.
Instead of addressing the problem, inadequate or nonexistent league policies and codes of conduct mean that aggressors have not been dealt with appropriately, and the survivors of domestic violence have been left behind.
There is no place in any society for these horrifying acts of domestic violence and sexual assault.
Our nation’s professional sports leagues have a unique ability to make a difference.
The American people need you to step up and this committee wants to know what you’re going to do to take a stand.
(Washington, DC) – Today, United States Senator Dean Heller questioned auto executives during a Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee hearing examining airbag defects and the vehicle recall process.
Senator Heller first asked a Takata Corporation executive if his company took responsibility for its actions.
Senator Heller then asked a Honda executive if members of his own family were safe driving Honda vehicles.
(Washington, DC) – Today, United States Senator Dean Heller spoke at the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee hearing, “Mental Health and Suicide Among Veterans,” about the importance of addressing the VA’s disability claims backlog in order to speed up services for mental health treatment and lower suicide rates for veterans.
REMARKS AS PREPARED:
First, I would like to take a moment to acknowledge two witnesses here today, Mrs. Selke and Mrs. Pallotta. I cannot begin to imagine your loss and I truly admire your bravery coming here today to talk about your sons. They served our country with valor and we must honor that by making sure every veteran from here on out is cared for when they return home.
Chairman Sanders and Ranking Member Burr—I also want to thank you for bringing this issue before the Committee, especially because of the impact it has on veterans in my state.
To put it in perspective—between 2008 and 2012, 593 veterans from Nevada were lost to suicide.
Six months ago, I would have looked at that number and asked why is it so high? What is missing within the VA or VA benefits that so many of Nevada’s veterans resort to this?
I think we now know that a big part of the problem is veterans’ access to care at VA facilities. This is such a critical thing to get right at the VA because of the ripple effect it has on a veteran’s well-being.
Whether it is medical care, mental health treatment, or support during transition to civilian life, veterans being forced to wait for care from the VA can be detrimental.
That is why I have asked the Las Vegas VA Director to send me reports about wait times for primary care, specialty care, and mental health treatment for Southern Nevada’s Veterans.
Every two weeks, for both Las Vegas and Reno, I track these numbers for improvements.
In the most recent data, patients already receiving mental health care from VA facilities in Nevada wait a week or less for an appointment.
Unfortunately, the average wait time for new patients seeking mental health treatment is 23 days in Reno and 46 days in Las Vegas.
Even worse, a clinic in Northwest Las Vegas has an average wait time of 64 days for new patients.
Veterans in need of mental health treatment absolutely cannot be waiting more than 2 months to be seen.
I have been pushing every one of these facilities to improve these wait times in the coming months and want to hear from the VA today about what resources it will be devoting to mental health treatment.
We must also remember that scheduling an appointment is not the only barrier to receiving care. Veterans must also qualify for this care.
One of the best ways to ensure veterans qualify for mental health services is by reducing the VA’s disability claims backlog.
Veterans with post-traumatic stress who have a PTS-related claim approved will be able to access VA’s mental health services and treatment.
This claims backlog is an issue I have brought up during every Committee hearing because I believe it should be a top priority of the VA and of this Committee.
That is why I sent a letter to the Chairman requesting that he re-schedule a legislative hearing to consider my bipartisan bill to address the VA claims process.
Nevada Veterans have one of the longest waits in the nation at 248 days on average to complete a claim, and 240,000 veterans nationwide are still waiting longer than the VA’s 125-day deadline.
Until this backlog is eliminated, veterans will continue to face delays to accessing the mental health treatment they need.
With 22 veteran suicides a day and nearly 600 veteran suicides in Nevada over the past five years, it is clear that something must be done to improve the current state of mental health services at the VA.
The VA facilities in my state know that I will use my oversight role on this Committee to continue holding them accountable for performance, timeliness and the quality of care they provide to Nevada’s veterans.
I look forward to hearing from the witnesses today about what VA is doing to address this crisis and how Congress can help in this effort.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Sep 16 2014
(Washington, DC) – Today, United States Senator Dean Heller spoke at the Senate Commerce Consumer Protection, Product Safety, and Insurance Subcommittee hearing, “Oversight of and Policy Considerations for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,” about the importance of states individually deciding what legislation is necessary to improve safety on the roads. Specifically in Nevada, Heller cited growth within the state on I-11 is a priority in keeping the roads safe with the opening of the Tesla Gigafactory.
REMARKS AS PREPARED:
Good afternoon, thank you Chairman McCaskill for calling this hearing today. I appreciate our witnesses being here and I look forward to this important discussion on NHTSA and its progress in implementing various requirements under MAP-21.
NHTSA plays a vital role in ensuring the highest standards in motor vehicles and highway safety so that we are continually working toward preventing crashes and keeping motorists safe.
I think it goes without saying both the Chairman and I have been very interested in the process at NHTSA, especially in light of the General Motors recall. As it relates to NHTSA, we have paid close attention to what information NHTSA was able to obtain from the car company, what it did with it, and what its role was in the delay to get these cars recalled.
After multiple hearings, I have come to the conclusion that General Motors bears the majority of the blame. NHTSA cannot be effective when auto manufacturers withhold information.
General Motors has admitted that they did not fully understand how their vehicles were built which led to a decade long delay to understand the root cause of the air bag non-deployment was an ignition switch that slipped from run to accessory too easily.
However, NHTSA could have performed better. Energy and Commerce Committee Republicans released a staff report this morning that finds among other things, that NHTSA is struggling to keep pace with the industry it oversees.
This is not a new problem. As some of you may know, in 2009, NHTSA was forced to enlist the help of NASA to supplement its understanding of computer-controlled electronic systems, electromagnetic interference, and software integrity as they relate to unintended acceleration.
I hope we can use today’s hearing to identify areas for improvement at NHTSA, including its internal process for identifying issues and connecting the dots.
I am also concerned the President has not filled the vacancy for the position of Administrator at NHTSA. The task of addressing any shortcomings at the agency and implementing any necessary improvements may be challenging for a deputy Administrator without the endorsement of the President’s nomination and the Senate’s confirmation.
This is all very important for highway safety across America, but NHTSA is also becoming more important for the for the state of Nevada.
Madame Chairman, you may have heard TESLA has selected Nevada for its Gigafactory.
I was proud to help bring TESLA to Nevada. The jobs it will create coupled with the economic boom it will cause in the state are both welcomed benefits of this massive investment.
This factory will bring over 6500 direct, high-paying jobs and billions of dollars in economic impact. This project will increase the employment in the region by more than 20%.
The facility will be one of the largest in the world with five million square feet of the factory devoted to battery manufacturing. This makes Nevada the epicenter of clean vehicle technology.
All of this means Nevada is growing. With that growth, we will need the necessary infrastructure to move people around safely and efficiently.
That is why I am also working on extending Interstate 11 beyond Las Vegas to the northwest part of the state.
And, it is also why I have such an interest in the programs NHTSA administers.
Nevada is going to need flexibility to address the specific state needs and challenges, and I look forward to hearing from our witnesses – in particular, from the Governors State Highway Safety Association – on how best to allocate federal funds to maximize state flexibility without compromising national safety priorities.
Nevada was one of the leading states to develop a Strategic Highway Safety Plan even before it was required by law because Nevada’s highway safety goal is simple: zero fatalities.
Nevada has emphasized five critical areas for reduction of fatal and serious injury crashes that center on:
1) Lane departures – the majority of rural roadway fatalities in Nevada are from lane departures.
3) Impaired Drivers
4) Occupant Protection
My point in explaining this is that other states may have critical areas and that states may want to allocate funding differently than Nevada.
As we work toward a reauthorization of NHTSA, I want the record to note how different each state is. Therefore, we need a plan flexible enough so each state can come up with a strategy best suited for each individual state to achieve its goal of zero fatalities on the road.
Thank you Chairman McCaskill.
(Washington, D.C.) – Today, United States Senator Dean Heller reaffirmed his commitment to address the VA’s disability claims backlog at a Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee hearing held to assess the state of VA Health Care.
Remarks as prepared:
Thank you Chairman Sanders and Ranking Member Burr for holding this hearing. Oversight by this Committee is critical at a time when the VA is in transition, and Nevada’s Veterans expect accountability.
I know I, along with many Veterans in Nevada, have been pleased so far with Secretary McDonald.
In the many times we have met in my office, in this Committee, and in Reno just a few weeks ago, Secretary McDonald has shown he is committed to bringing new vision and reforms to the VA to better serve Nevada and our nation’s Veterans.
But the task ahead will be VA’s most difficult challenge after having failed our veterans in delivering quality health care and timely benefits. The gross mismanagement, poor treatment of veterans, and long delays revealed in Phoenix and elsewhere has shocked Congress and our nation, and is a significant crisis to overcome.My hope is that the Secretary’s goals will not get lost in bureaucracy, and I expect consistent communication and honesty about what the VA needs from Congress to restore faith in the VA and achieve the best care possible for veterans.
Just last week, I had the privilege to meet with Veterans from Pahrump, Nevada.
In the past 15 years, Pahrump has grown from a small town outside Las Vegas to a community of 36,000. In Pahrump and all of Nye County, there are about 9,000 Veterans, which is why the community has fought for a larger VA clinic as more veterans flock to Pahrump.
When visiting, I told them about the promise I made to you, Secretary, when we first met.
Every time I see you, I will always bring up several key issues to Nevada Veterans: building the VA clinic in Pahrump, improving the Las Vegas VA hospital, and eliminating the disability claims backlog at the Reno VARO.
Bob deserves credit here for quickly approving the Pahrump clinic as soon as he was confirmed, and I also appreciate that Director Duff and Associate Director Caron worked closely with my office to keep me informed.
But there is still a lot of work to be done on this clinic--a contract must be awarded, the clinic must be constructed, and then it must be fully staffed.
I'll be looking closely at each of these steps to determine if there are unnecessary bureaucratic barriers that delay projects like this and will hold the VA accountable.
I also hope to see improvements at the Las Vegas VA hospital.
There has been discussion about how to do this and I’d like to share a few key improvements that need to be made.
First, members of the Disabled American Veterans in Nevada want to improve transportation of rural veterans to the hospital.
Right now, DAV has a volunteer transportation program, but they are not allowed to take veterans confined to a wheelchair or utilizing an oxygen tank.
There needs to be a greater partnership and coordination with the VA to expand the VA’s own transportation service for these disabled veterans in rural areas.
Secondly, appointment wait times at the Vegas hospital must be improved. New patients in Vegas waited 25 days on average for specialty care appointments, and 16 days on average for mental health appointments.
Director Duff has assured me her team is working to improve these wait times, and part of this improvement will be an enhanced scheduling system the VA is currently seeking.
Every VA hospital needs modern processes and technology that will give directors the information they need to determine where resources are missing.
Lastly, a point that the Secretary has brought up to me is the differences in regions and management structure among the three VA administrations: health care, benefits, and cemeteries.
I look forward to working with him to improve the current structure and believe that reorganizing these administrations could be a positive step forward to enhance coordination and improve care at the VA.
Finally, I remain committed to addressing the VA’s disability claims backlog. For over a year now, Nevada is still the worst in the nation with claims being completed in 334 days on average.
As Co-Chair of the VA Backlog Working Group, I will be hosting a Roundtable later today along with Senator Casey to discuss the need to overhaul the outdated claims processing system.
I believe there is no better time to reform the claims process as the VA transforms under Secretary McDonald’s leadership, and the Working Group’s legislation is a strong platform for some of the changes that need to be made.
I look forward to hearing more about the changes and progress with improving care and benefits at the VA, and thank the Secretary and Inspector General Griffin for being here.
(Washington, D.C.) – Today, United States Senator Dean Heller spoke on the Senate floor about a very critical provision in the Conference Committee’s legislation that he, along with Senator Cory Booker, took a lead on addressing: extension of the Assisted Living Program for Veterans with Traumatic Brain Injury. This program operates in two locations in Nevada and serves wounded warriors who are trying to restore their quality of life.
(Washington, D.C.) – Today, U.S. Senator Dean Heller (R-NV) spoke at the Senate Public Lands, Forests, and Mining Subcommittee hearing in favor of two pieces of legislation seeking to address two difficult public lands issues arising in Nevada: the Good Samaritan Search and Recovery Act (S. 1049) and the Pinyon-Juniper Related Projects Implementation Act (S. 1640).
Remarks as prepared:
Thank you Chairman Manchin and Ranking Member Barrasso for holding this important hearing today, and for including two of my bills that seek to address two difficult public lands issues that have come up in Nevada.
The first of the two bills, the Good Samaritan Search and Recovery Act would solve a long-standing public safety issue in our National Parks, Forests and Public Lands. My friend and colleague in the House, Congressman Joe Heck, and I introduced this legislation in response to the tragic stories of Mr. Keith Goldberg and Air Force Staff Sargent Antonio Tucker.
Both of these individuals were missing for over a year before volunteer, Good Samaritan rescue teams received government authorization to begin searching. This bipartisan common-sense legislation would allow for expedited access to public lands for Good Samaritan search and recovery organizations so that they may conduct searches for missing persons.
I would personally like to thank Keith Goldberg’s Sister Jodi and her husband Paul Thompson and Keith’s brother Jeff Goldberg who have joined us here today and support for their tireless work and advocacy on behalf of this legislation. This family’s courage and resilience is truly inspiring, I am grateful for the sacrifices they have made to advance our bill.
Their brother Keith disappeared on January 31, 2012. He was believed to be the victim of murder, but the police, operating on thin resources, were unable to continue the search for his body in the Las Vegas desert. His family went without closure for far too long.
When new evidence pointed towards the Lake Mead recreational area, Mr. Goldberg’s sister, Jodi, reached out to a private search and rescue team to look for her brother. All that prevented the rescue team from discovering Mr. Goldberg’s body was the bureaucratic red tape of the National Park Service, which refused to allow them to search the area without a permit and a $1 million insurance policy.
After the family spent six months finding an insurer and raising the money to buy the policy, the search team found Keith Goldberg in two hours.
Staff Sergeant Antonio Tucker’s family suffered a similarly frustrating ordeal. Staff Sergeant Tucker was stationed at Creech Air Force Base, when he went missing on June 23, 2012. He was believed drowned. A Good Samaritan search team offered to look for Staff Sergeant Tucker but was blocked by the Park Service, which required insurance and a special search permit. These hurdles were finally overcome about a year later. The team, possessing superior equipment to government divers, found the body within two days.
No family should have to go through what the Goldberg and Tucker families have had to endure by waiting a year to recover a loved one. Our legislation will prevent such needless red tape from interfering in the search and recovery of lost persons. It will provide qualified and trained search and rescue groups with expedited access to park service land if they sign a liability waiver. It requires the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to implement a process to expedite access to Federal lands for Good Samaritan search-and-recovery operations. And it will give the Secretary the authority to develop long-term partnerships with search and recovery organizations to help facilitate and expedite such Good Samaritan missions for missing persons.
The Good Samaritan Search and Recovery Act has the ability to conserve government resources, to provide families closure, and even to save lives. The House version of this bill passed the House of Representatives unanimously last year. I would also like to thank Senators Warner, Tester, Hatch, and Chambliss for cosponsoring my bill. I am confident it can garner similar overwhelming support in the Senate if given the opportunity.
My second bill before this committee, the Pinyon-Juniper Related Projects Implementation Act is a bipartisan bill, requested by local government officials from Lincoln County, Nevada.
The bill will amend existing law to provide local officials more flexibility to carry out conservation and land-use goals, such as infrastructure development, wildlife conservation, and wildfire prevention.
Because nearly 85 percent of the land in Nevada is administered by the federal government, it presents our local and state governments with many unique challenges. In order to accommodate the needs to of Lincoln County, Congress passed the Lincoln County Land Act in 2000 and the Lincoln County Conservation, Recreation and Development Act in 2004.
It has become apparent that the current authorities of those existing laws do not serve to effectively facilitate the successful implementation of these important environmental protections and land use initiatives. To address these limitations, I introduced this bill to makes minor improvements to those laws, by improving the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) administration of watersheds and wildlife habitat, and to enhance economic development in Lincoln County. Nevada Congressmen Mark Amodei and Steve Horsford introduced nearly identical bipartisan legislation in the House as well.
Given that this bill will spur economic growth and create much needed jobs, in a county faced with an unemployment rate of 10 percent, I look forward to working with the members of this committee to move this important legislation forward.
Once again, I would like to express my appreciation to the Committee of holding this important hearing today. I encourage our full Committee Chair to move both of these important bills forward in our next business meeting.
(Washington, D.C.) – Recently, U.S. Senator Dean Heller (R-NV) spoke on the Senate floor in support of legislation amending the USA Freedom Act. Reflecting bipartisan and bicameral changes, the legislation ends bulk data collection practices currently used by the government. The legislation goes one step further by clearly outlining to America’s intelligence officials specific rules to follow so that they can keep the operational capabilities necessary to protect the United States from a terror attack without infringing upon the Fourth Amendment rights of American citizens.
Remarks as prepared:
Today, my colleague, Senator Leahy, the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, introduced legislation that would amend the USA FREEDOM ACT. This new legislation reflects a bicameral and bipartisan compromise that ends the bulk data collection practices currently used. It also gives our intelligence officials specific rules to follow so that they can keep the operational capabilities necessary to protect the United States from a terror attack without compromising the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution.
I would like to thank Senator Leahy for his work, and am grateful for his partnership. This important step is necessary for restoring Americans’ privacy rights, which were taken by a well-intended, but overreaching federal government, in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Mr. President, the expanded authority given to the National Security Agency through executive action and the PATRIOT ACT was intended to prevent another attack on America. While I was not a member of Congress on 9/11, I shared the horror all Nevadans felt watching the murder of thousands of innocent Americans, and the profound sadness as buildings in New York City and Washington D.C. sat smoldering.
I understand as well as anyone here the reasoning behind the actions our nation’s leaders took to ensure that another attack on America never materialized, and why our leaders felt that no limits should be imposed, no matter what the cost. Americans had to be protected against another attack.
Viewing the situation from that lens, it is easy to understand how the Fourth Amendment was brushed aside as the United States Senate expanded law enforcement surveillance capabilities with just one dissenting vote.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation then used Section 215 of the PATRIOT ACT to expand the scope of surveillance far beyond even what some of the authors believed they were authorizing.
The FBI argued that Section 215 provided authority to collect phone data of law-abiding citizens without their knowledge. Specifically, they could use the “business records” provision to force phone companies to turn over millions of telephone calls when there is reasonable ground or relevance to believe that the information sought is relevant to an authorized investigation of international terrorism.
As a result we now have a bulk collection program in existence where telephone companies hand over millions of records to the NSA as part of a massive pre-collection database.
As someone who voted against the PATRIOT Act multiple times, I believe such data collection practices are a massive intrusion of privacy, which is why I partnered with the senior Senator from Vermont to end these programs. Our legislation tightens the definition of “specific selection term” for Section 215 of the PATRIOT ACT and FISA pen register trap and trace devices so that the information requested is limited to specifically identifying a person, account, address, or personal device.
With this legislation, bulk collection will be eliminated and the records will stay with the telephone companies. The massive information grabs from the federal government based on geography or email service will no longer be permissible. And of the information that is collected, the legislation imposes new restrictions on the use and retention of it.
These reforms will help shift the balance of privacy away from the federal government and back to American citizens.
I am proud that this bill also includes the Franken Heller Surveillance Transparency Act of 2013. I was pleased to join Senator Franken on this legislation because, at the very least, Americans deserve to know the number of people whose information is housed by the NSA. For the first time in American history, the government is forced to disclose to the American people roughly how many of them have had their communications collected.
Our provisions call for reports by the Director of National Intelligence detailing the requests for information authorized under the PATRIOT ACT and the FISA Amendments Act.
The reports would specify the total number of people whose information has been collected under these programs and how many people living in the United States (or “likely Americans”) have had their information collected. They also would permit the Intelligence Community to report on how many Americans actually had their information looked at by the NSA or any other intelligence agencies.
Furthermore, these provisions would allow telephone and Internet companies to tell consumers basic information regarding the FISA Court orders they receive and the number of users whose information is turned over.
The principles outlined in this bill to increase transparency for Americans and private companies would clear up a tremendous amount of confusion that exists with these programs.
And our private companies need the added disclosure. The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation estimates that American cloud computing companies could lose 22 to 35 billion dollars in the next three years because of concerns about their involvement with surveillance programs. The analytics firm Forrester puts potential losses much higher, at $180 billion.
I want to be clear; I share the concerns of all Americans that we must protect ourselves against threats to the homeland. I believe that terrorism is very real and the United States is the target of those looking to undermine the freedoms we hold as the core of our national identity.
And if the bulk collection programs in existence were bearing so much information to protect the Homeland, it would change my opinion on the need for the USA FREEDOM ACT.
However, the bulk collection program has simply not provided the tangible results that justify a privacy intrusion of this level. We know this because on October 2, 2013, the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Leahy, asked NSA Director Keith Alexander the following question, and I quote:
At our last hearing, the deputy director, Mr. Ingliss stated that there’s only really one example of a case where, but for the use of Section 215, both phone records collection, terrorist activity was stopped. Was Mr. Ingliss’ right?
To which Director Alexander responded:
He’s right. I believe he said two, Chairman.
Mr. President, Congress has authorized the collection of millions of law abiding citizens’ telephone metadata for years and it has only solved two ongoing FBI investigations.
Of those two investigations, the NSA has publicly identified one. And in fact, that case could have easily been handled by obtaining a warrant and going to the telephone company.
It is the case of an individual in San Diego who was convicted of sending $8,500 to Somalia in support of Al Shabab, the terror organization claiming responsibility for the Kenyan mall attack. The American phone records allowed the NSA to determine that a U.S. phone was used to contact an individual associated with this terror organization.
I am appreciative that the NSA was able to apprehend this individual, but it does not provide overwhelming evidence that this program is necessary. Mr. President, the Obama Administration has come to the same conclusion. So has the Intelligence community.
The operational capabilities the Intelligence community relies on to conduct their mission to keep us safe will not be impacted by the USA FREEDOM Act. If it were, the Intelligence Community and the Administration would not have brokered this compromise legislation. Ending the bulk collection programs and giving Americans more transparency so they can determine for themselves whether they believe these programs should exists is obligation we have to our constituents.
We have a bill introduced today that would give our law enforcement authorities the tools they need to keep us safe while also staying true to the Fourth Amendment. I encourage my colleagues to support these important reforms and hope that it can quickly be considered by this Chamber.
Mr. President, I yield the floor.